995 was my first digiscoping-camera an it worked quite well for me.
The sharpness of the in focus-shots was great, and the details came out very well.
The disliked the colours of this cameras a little bit. They weren't as authentic as the
colours produced by other Nikon Coolpix
cameras. Sometimes they looked really funny and
nothing to do with the reality.
and 5000
).
995 produced heavy chromatic abberations and color-fringing. Much more
than the other Coolpix
cameras did. Sometimes they were so heavy, that it was very hard for
me to remove afterwards in photoshop.
worked much more precisely.
Digiscoped
with Nikon Coolpix
995 and Swarovski 80HD
Spotting Scope
and I've used both cameras at the same time
for a while. Whenever I were out photographing with the Coolpix 990
I had lots of good, sharp
shots. When I were out with the Nikon Coolpix
995, there were only a few hits on the
memory card.
Crop of an original digiscoped
Nikon Coolpix
995 file. Sharpness was ok and lots of details in the feathers.
This shot was taken with ISO200, and for that there is quite less noise in the pic.
995 is a quite good digiscoping
camera, but far away from the
Nikon Coolpix 990
. If the focus worked better, this could have been a perfect digiscoping
camera, but unfortunately the focus doesn't.
995 is a bad camera. No, it isn't a bad one for digiscoping
, but
the 990
is slightly better. For more comparision-infos of the coolpix
range, please have
a look at the grey box at the top of the page.